
This time last week, Nintendo and data-game developer Niantic co-released a new location and treasure hunt game, Pokémon GO, as part of Nintendo’s Pokémon franchise. Niantic began as an in-house Google startup, and has made its name with products in the augmented reality category. The companies have been separate for nine months.
Today, Pokémon GO leads mobile app rankings in the US, and Monday was a great day for Nintendo’s stock. (Forbes doubts it’s worth it.)
Meanwhile, in Baton Rouge, LA, where police shot and killed Alton Sterling last week, 138 miles away from where Essence Bowman died in police custody at the end of June, “heavily armed riot police” invaded Lisa Batiste-Swilley’s yard to collect and arrest anti-brutality protesters.
Batiste-Swilley explained to CBS reporter David Begnaud how it felt to be railroaded and her property targeted and physically overrun by local officers. (The Twitter clip is rough, uncaptioned, and embedded.) 1
Finally, in Missouri, where police shot and killed Michael Brown in August 2014, officers worried that people who play Pokémon GO in unfamiliar locations could fall vulnerable to crime and injury.
Now’s your chance to discover and capture the Pokémon all around you—so get your shoes on, step outside, and explore the world.” —Pokémon GO‘s app description
One of the most common lines in articles about this game are that it’s great for “exploring.” Exploring what? Crowds are—as I type—milling around Central Park and getting summer-fresh air, phones in hand and eyes on screen. They’re exploring something, but whether that something is Central Park is not obvious.
Mashable reports that the pool at the 9/11 memorial in New York is a registered Pokéstop, a location where players can collect game characters. A few states away in Massachusetts, Boon Sheridan’s family home has become unusually interesting to pedestrians and drivers alike: it was once a church, it’s on the Pokémon GO location list, and gamers keep hovering.
Players seeking out virtual Pokéstops and gyms, where characters battle other characters, have to go to the game-indicated locations in the physical world. And in order to get their points, they get to traipse up and through these places to “collect” what’s there regardless of the local context.
Regardless of the people already present, regardless of whether that place is a site that the community holds sacred, home, yard, or national memorial—there are points to be gathered.
Early this morning, Twitter user @pyratejack explained that Pokémon GO‘s underlying location data is user-generated data from Niantic’s older location game, Ingress. And Ingress included World War II concentration camps in its location data until Germans protested two years ago.
Ingress is made by Niantic Labs, essentially a tiny startup inside Google run by John Hanke, the brains behind Google Earth, Maps and Street View.” —Jessica Guynn, USA TODAY, July 2, 2015
What makes big data “Big Data” is its sheer scale. And what makes user-contributed data challenging is the labor required to review, clean, and validate it. Like the government, data companies like Google have exobytes of data about ordinary people and our lived world. Much of that data is from the open source web, and the rest is, like Pokémon GO‘s source data, user-contributed.
This isn’t 2013 or 2014, and our headlines aren’t full of “metadata” or “surveillance” anymore, but the data is still accumulating from our phone companies, street and highway cameras, social media profiles and app use.
More and more devices are location-aware, or talk to devices that are location-aware. This lets you recreate people’s movements decades after the fact, something we’ve never been able to do before.
If you have a predictive search engine, it stores all kinds of things that people paste into their text fields by accident, including passwords… The whole point of having a data lake is so you can just chuck things in there and go fishing for patterns later…
We teach [the government] how to spy on us. When they want the data badly enough, they just come and take it.” —Maciej Ceglowski, Haunted by Data, October 1, 2015 2
Some data companies are actively investing in data science and development; others are cutting expenses by passing onto the public the labor of contributing to their databases. Some companies are also cutting expenses on development and analysis by only minimally assessing the quality of data that users submit. But when the convention of these companies is share and share alike, one company’s app and underlying databases lead to the next. Ingress becomes Pokémon GO.
It’s not the technology per se that worries me, it’s the lack of historical perspective and depth, and quite frankly the lack of values and ethics.” —R. Avraham Cooper, the Simon Wiesenthal Center
“It seems a little insensitive,” Mashable’s Andrea Romano mused this morning, for the 9/11 memorial to be transmogrified into “a gathering spot so people can scoop up little cartoon monsters.”
Had there been apps like Ingress in the days of Vespucci, Cortés, Columbus, Smith, and Raleigh, they would have been based on user-generated maps, and these maps, like the maps these naval explorers actually used, would have aggregated objects of desire all over the Western Hemisphere.
Regardless of context, regardless of the people already in situ, regardless of whether the objects’ locations were community sacred sites, regardless of local meanings, Vespucci, Cortés, Columbus, Smith, and Raleigh operated on the principle that their virtual data adventures trumped local data and life.
Wherever their maps showed the fountain of youth or the city of gold, even if those locations overlaid entire nations and peoples, they claimed the right to go, explore, discover, and capture, and people’s lives became their gamespace.
As Pokémon GO overlays objects of desire on places with local significance, players play the game by using its maps to trump local experience. It’s post-16th Century colony, but not at all postcolonial. We’re demonstrating that when we get the chance to enroll in well-worn habits of relation and place, we take them.
So this logic is likely to keep surfacing: in the just-a-game of Pokémon GO, in urban renewal and gentrification programs, in civic technology, and in the products of businesses like Niantic. In the same way that corporations and governments find ways to use the data we conventionally produce, both corporations and governments will find ways to leverage our wish to augment reality and play with location.
In this climate though, Baton Rouge must be a warning to us: whether we’re escaping our troubles or deadly serious about protests, the government has the power to make even our house-guests its objects of desire. Armed with riot gear and legal force, it can and will “collect” from us whatever it wants whenever it wants it.
And we are teaching it how.
- Today, locals explained that they know Batiste-Swilley to be a justice advocate. She is also the most recent board chair of an HIV/AIDS nonprofit in Baton Rouge; feel free to support the organization’s work. [Back to text: ◄]
- Jonathan Stegall shared Ceglowski’s talk with me this morning. Read the whole thing: it’s well worth it. [Back to text: ◄]